Amber Mills and colleagues new paper Maternal use of electronic cigarettes and impact on offspring: a double-hit model is a follow-up study to their earlier work showing that mother (rat) exposure to e-cigarette aerosol during pregnancy harmed offspring. The new study shows that the adverse effects of in utero (i.e., to the developing fetuses inContinue reading “Damage to offspring caused by moms’ e-cig exposure during pregnancy persists long after birth and makes offspring more sensitive to e-cig insults”
Author Archives: Stanton Glantz
Breathing ecig PG/VG during pregnancy harms offspring (in rats)
E-cigarette advocates, including the National Health Service in England, promote e-cigarette use to pregnant women as an alternative to smoking cigarettes. When we conducted our systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between e-cigarette use and disease in people, there were not enough studies of effects on pregnancy to do a quantitative risk estimate. TheContinue reading “Breathing ecig PG/VG during pregnancy harms offspring (in rats)”
e-cig PG/VG and nicotine promote tumor growth and metastasis
E-cigarettes deliver nicotine to users by aerosolizing “e-liquid” that is a solution containing nicotine and flavoring agents. The solvent used to dissolve these elements usually consists of propylene glycol and glycerin (PG/VG), which is recognized by the FDA as “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for ingestion (eating), so people generally don’t worry about it. InContinue reading “e-cig PG/VG and nicotine promote tumor growth and metastasis”
Genetic evidence that e-cigarettes increase cancer (and other disease) risk among young adults
E-cigarette advocates — as well as regulators like the FDA — are fond of pointing out that nicotine is not a carcinogen (chemical that causes cancer) and noting that because they do not involve combustion, e-cigarettes do not deliver many carcinogenic chemicals produced by burning cigarettes. A new paper by Stella Tommasi , Ahmad BesaratiniaContinue reading “Genetic evidence that e-cigarettes increase cancer (and other disease) risk among young adults”
FDA should deny renewal of PMI’s modified risk claim for Swedish Match Snus because of joint marketing with ZYN nicotine pouches
My UCSF colleagues and I submitted this public comment to FDA. It is an updated version of the one we submitted to TPSAC on June 20, 2024. A PDF is here. The Regulations.gov tracking number is lz3-50m7-es1x. FDA should consider the significant public health issues, especially for youth, created by Philip Morris International’s co-marketing ofContinue reading “FDA should deny renewal of PMI’s modified risk claim for Swedish Match Snus because of joint marketing with ZYN nicotine pouches”
FDA should not renew permission for PMI Swedish Match snus to make modified risk claims
My UCSF colleagues and I submitted this public comment to FDA last week opposing renewal of its marketing order allowing PMI’s Swedish Match Snus to make modified risk claims. (This is an updated version of the comment we submitted to TPSAC on June 10, 2024. I was backpacking when the comment was actually submitted, henceContinue reading “FDA should not renew permission for PMI Swedish Match snus to make modified risk claims”
UCSF releases 350k more Juul documents, bringing total to over 2.2 million
On July 25, 2024 the UCSF Industry Documents Library added 350,00 new JUUL Labs documents to the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library, bringing the total number of publicly available previously secret Juul documents to over 2.2 million. And, there is more to come. These documents have already lead to six publications, including two recent importantContinue reading “UCSF releases 350k more Juul documents, bringing total to over 2.2 million”
The evidence that secondhand smoke causes breast cancer keeps piling up. When will Surg Gen, CDC, ACS and others start acting on this evidence?
In 2005 the California EPA found secondhand smoke caused breast cancer in younger women. (Related regulatory documents available here.) Amazingly, as of 2024 — 19 years later — neither the CDC (and the Surgeon General, who follows the CDC) nor the American Cancer Society list smoking or secondhand smoke as risk factors for breast cancer.Continue reading “The evidence that secondhand smoke causes breast cancer keeps piling up. When will Surg Gen, CDC, ACS and others start acting on this evidence?”
Criticism of our meta-analysis of e-cigarettes and disease and our response is published
NEJM Evidence has published two letters to the editor that raised questions about our meta-analysis, Population-Based Disease Odds for E-Cigarettes and Dual Use versus Cigarettes that concluded that for cardiovascular disease, stroke and metabolic disorder e-cigarette risks are similar to cigarettes and for respiratory and oral disease, while lower risk than cigarettes, the risks areContinue reading “Criticism of our meta-analysis of e-cigarettes and disease and our response is published”
DOJ and DEA should reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III to identify regulatory approaches from tobacco to apply to cannabis
My UCSF colleagues and I submitted this comment to DOJ supporting reschduling marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III ( PDF). The regulations.gov tracking number is lyx-h4jq-93z8. The Department of Justice and Drug Enforcement Agency should reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III to allow consideration of the health, safety, and abuse liability impactsContinue reading “DOJ and DEA should reclassify marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III to identify regulatory approaches from tobacco to apply to cannabis”
Stanton Glantz blog 