Dual use is not an intermediate condition on the way from cigarettes to “switching completely” or quitting

Discussion of potential harm reduction associated with the use of e-cigarettes assumes that smokers will “switch completely” from cigarettes to e-cigarettes or stop both tobacco products. Advocates of this view, including the US FDA, recognize and accept that this process may include a period of dual use in which smokers use both products. Now Josef Hamoud and colleagues have examined trajectories of both product users over time among people who are dual users and found that the assumption that dual use is a transition of e-cigarette only use or tobacco abstinence is wrong.

Specifically, their new paper A Systematic Review Investigating the Impact of Dual Use of E-Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes on Smoking Cessation, which quantified use status transitions of the same people over time around 6 (graphic above), 12, 24 and 48 months between dual (DU), exclusive e-cigarette (EC), exclusive cigarette (CC), and non-use (NU). They found that dual use is very common and cannot merely be considered a short-term transitional status. Specifically, they concluded, “Current evidence suggests that DU is not a first step toward smoking cessation, with most DUs continuing cigarette consumption either through persistent DU or exclusive CC smoking. Relatively fewer dual users transitioned into complete nicotine abstinence compared to exclusive CC and exclusive EC users.

This is an important finding because dual use is riskier than cigarette smoking or e-cigarette use alone. While most randomized controlled trials of e-cigarettes as medical cessation treatments did not report dual use among patients who were “treated” with e-cigarettes did nor report dual use as an outcome, those that did found that more smokers randomized to receive e-cigarettes became dual users that switched completely. Dual use is also common among people using e-cigarettes as consumer products: the 2020 Eurobarometer survey reported that 59% of European e-cigarette users also smoke conventional cigarettes.

The bottom line: “our results suggest that in naturalistic observations dual users are less likely than exclusive CC smokers or exclusive EC users to quit smoking, falling in line with evidence implying that DU use might reinforce nicotine dependence.”

As a result dual use should be considered an adverse outcome in clinical trials and evidence for harm enhancement in population studies.

Here is the abstract:

Background. Dual use (DU) of conventional cigarettes (CC) and e-cigarettes (EC) has emerged as a common pattern among youth and adult populations. This review aims to investigate whether dual use can promote smoking cessation.

Methods. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and all longitudinal studies reporting transitions between DU, exclusive e-cigarette use and exclusive conventional cigarette use were included. Two independent reviewers screened and read all records. Use status transitions among dual users were compared to transitions among exclusive e-cigarette users and exclusive CC smokers.

Results. Forty-six records (sixteen original studies) were identified. Of sixteen included studies, eight could be pooled for meta-analysis. The studies showed great heterogeneity, and many presented moderate to high risks of bias. Most dual users who changed state transitioned to cigarette smoking. Baseline dual users were less likely to report a transition into complete abstinence compared to exclusive CC smokers and exclusive EC users. About one-fifth of dual users remained in the same use status after >16–24 months, exposing them to DU for a prolonged time. After >24–48 months, 8% of DU maintained DU.

Conclusion. Current evidence suggests that DU is not a first step toward smoking cessation, with most DUs continuing cigarette consumption either through persistent DU or exclusive CC smoking. Relatively fewer dual users transitioned into complete nicotine abstinence compared to exclusive CC and exclusive EC users. The concerns raised about limitations of current evidence highlight the need for more research focussed on use status transitions among dual users.

The full citation is: Hamoud J, Hanewinkel R, Andreas S, et al. A Systematic Review Investigating the Impact of Dual Use of E-Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes on Smoking Cessation. ERJ Open Res 2024; in press (https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00902-2024). It is available here.

Published by Stanton Glantz

Stanton Glantz is a retired Professor of Medicine who served on the University of California San Francisco faculty for 45 years. He conducts research on tobacco and cannabis control and cardiovascular disease/

3 thoughts on “Dual use is not an intermediate condition on the way from cigarettes to “switching completely” or quitting

  1. This is confusing flow and stock. Focusing solely on individuals currently classified as dual users introduces a selection bias, emphasizing those who remain in dual use. A more insightful question examines lifetime dual use (i.e., those who have ever been dual users) and explores its associations.

    UK data shows a 50% reduction in dual user Dual Users among daily vapers in the past decade.

    https://smokinginengland.info/graphs/e-cigarettes-latest-trends

    Furthermore, dual use is associated with dramatic declines in total toxicant exposure, when measured prospectively.
    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16063

    Like

      1. Another problem: the “50% reduction in daily vapers who are dual users” is overly normalized and omits key context:

        • For 8 of those 10 years, most or nearly most daily vapers were dual users
        • Even today, 1 out of 3 daily vapers are dual users
        • And “daily” omits data
        • When you look at all e-cig users, 40% are dual users today

        Source: https://smokinginengland.info/graphs/e-cigarettes-latest-trends

        In short: dual use remains almost half.

        E-cigarette enthusiasts then argue: dual use is a transition. As Homoud et. all find: no. The transition is seldom to e-cig only or no use. In fact dual users are less likely to quit smoking.

        E-cig enthusiasts then argue: your studies are merely cross-sectional. No: Homoud includes only longitudinal studies.

        E-cig enthusiasts: well somehow it’s working, lots of people in the U.K. are using e-cigs to quit and the result is dramatic declines in smoking. No:

        Source: Smoking in England, graph by Simon Chapman.

        Bottom line: in the UK as elsewhere e-cigs are exposing millions to higher risks than smoking alone. You might hope this was a short term risk for individuals who then transition to quitting. Nope.

        Like

Leave a comment